Our mission: To preserve, promote, improve and strengthen public schools for both current and future generations of students.

Stephen Dyer, former legislator and education policy expert, looks at how Ohio’s charters actually perform in comparison to public schools. Spoiler alert: not well.

I’ve written a lot about how Ohio’s Charter School sector has epically failed Ohio’s school children for decades. Yet the federal government keeps shoveling money to them for some reason. The first $49.2 million of that grant funding has been opened up to 59 of 258 graded Ohio Charter Schools (only 20% of “Dropout Recovery” Charter Schools qualify, but I’ll deal with them later).

According to the state law about this federal grant, Charters that have a 4 or 5 star rating on Academic Progress and a 3, 4 or 5 star rating on overall test scores, or a meaningful increase in test scores over the last 3 years are eligible.

All but a couple of the qualifying Charters met this first of 4 criteria.

Great, right? I mean, these are supposed to be the kinds of Charter Schools we want to grow — high performing Charters.

Here’s the deal, though.

There are 7 graded metrics on the state report card. So while these Charter Schools — less than 1/4 of all Ohio Charter Schools — do have good grades in these two categories, they still really struggle in the other 5.

And Ohio School districts — 1/3 of whom would qualify for these federal funds if they were Charter Schools — do far, far better on those other metrics. How much better?

A sampling:

Read here for the complete picture.